In voters approved Initiative , which was supposed to set aside money for "emergencies. One provision of Initiative , codified as RCW SVC: Which Democrats are against it?
There seem to be quite a few for it, including the current governor and former Gov. From my little bit of reading, this resolution originated with the Democrats. Thanks for the info, it was the first result when I searched "washington ".
Sounds good after a skim-read, I think that is what the intent was Post a Comment. Politics from the Palouse to Puget Sound. Saturday, October 20, Washington Voting Resolution My ballot arrived by mail today, so it's time to try and swing things in our state in favor of good policies once again. One of the items that really has my attention and interest is Resolution , a proposal to change our state's constitution to authorize the establishment of a "budget stabilization account. It is also stated on the ballot that expenditures from the account shall be prohibited except as set forth in the amendment.
This prompted me to see what the conditions on expenditures are. There's the stuff you would expect, such as natural disasters, but then I found this whopper in the proposed subsection d of the new amendment text: " iii Any amount may be withdrawn and appropriated from the budget stabilization account at any time by the favorable vote of at least three-fifths of the members of each house of the legislature.
Posted by Paul E. Lawmakers who voted against the proposed enhanced constitutional savings account say it would restrict the freedom of lawmakers to spend extraordinary revenue growth. Here is a copy of our full analysis of SJR Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email.
Which local ballot measures are worth your vote? Legal analysis: Does the governor have the authority to order public employees to be vaccinated? Do we still need a state legislature? The litter is piling up in Washington.
0コメント